Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Is Funding the Arts A Frivolity?

The arts in the United States produces some 3 million full time jobs, from lighting technicians and rehearsal accompanists to opera singers, accountants and carpenters. This number grows exponentially many times over when you add the millions of service industry employees such as
bartenders, waitresses, cooks, dishwashers, cabbies and hotel workers - many of whose income is directly affected by whether or not a symphony, theatre company or opera house goes dark . . . or worse, under.

But we should expect NO argument ever to be won in the United States of the present on this particular front because, quite simply, as a nation we still tend see the arts as rated XXX: "X-tra" - "X-travagant" and "X-pendable."

While we will figure out how to split billions of dollars in bailing out a miniscule percentage of millionaires who irresponsibly and with contempt for "the little man" - men who basically raped and pillaged the working class, we will barely bat an eye while taking the money and food out of the mouths of the millions of Americans who, on a daily basis, help keep soldiers from blowing their brains out, or those who make the lives of countless low wage earners and other tax paying "second class citizens" bearable. Yes, let's take away the money for those who buoy the spirits
of tax paying potato pickers, fisherman and factory and office workers just Barely scraping by - they won't miss music or other arts, which our leaders seem to deem, essentially a frivolous waste.

The bigger question remains, however: Would we rather leave out a relatively small, but probably inestimably useful stimulus package for the arts now, or worry further down the pike about how we're going to employ, feed and house the millions whose lives are dependent upon the arts for more than just "entertainment" purposes?

Think about it.

Labels: , , , , ,


Blogger Smorg said...

I hear you, bro. This amendment sucks the wind out of me. :o( One would think that Sen. Coburn would know better about the businesses that depend on performance arts and museums than to go and make an argument like that, ay? Ughhh!

February 12, 2009 at 2:01 AM  
Blogger Sharky said...

Yeah, thanks for seeing it as it truly is!

I had an argument yesterday with someone who insisted that an electrician working in a hotel is more important and entitled to have his job saved than an electrician at a theatre. "How?" I asked. "Because!" was about the extent he was willing to argue.

I remember years ago a television ad with a hot dog vendor outside of a concert hall, and as he's handing a pair of tubesteaks to a well heeled couple, he turns to the camera and says something like "When you support the arts, your supporting a lot more than just artists, your supporting the economy . . . So, go to a concert, play or symphony." I'm sick to death of white trash bumpkins claiming the arts are elitist pursuit. I'm half White Trash and half Puerto Rican, and nothing could be further from the truth!


February 12, 2009 at 3:44 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home